MED-EL encourages you to compare our product reliability with that of our competitors. While doing so, please keep in mind that effective comparisons should include:
- Comparable number
of products in use - Same time frame
- Actual, current data
- Similar product generations
- Openness and completeness
of data presented using the same failure categories, including total number of explanted devices

In a Class of its Own
MED-EL Reliability Reporting:
Honest, Transparent, Up-to-date
MED−EL reliability reporting standards far exceed the reporting methods used by competitors. Our reliability data are prepared in accordance with ISO 5841-2:2000 which governs the reliability reporting for pacemakers.1 MED‑EL is the only company to report on both implant and processor related failures.
MED−EL is in a class of its own. Transparent, honest and up-to-date reporting shows that current MED−EL Hearing Implant Systems are the most reliable implants on the market today.
MED−EL is in a class of its own. Transparent, honest and up-to-date reporting shows that current MED−EL Hearing Implant Systems are the most reliable implants on the market today.
|
MED-EL |
Cochlear |
Advanced |
|||
|
Transparent reporting on all implant failures (including but not limited to device and accident related, as well as medical and surgical root causes for malfunction of the implant) |
|
|
|
||
|
Reporting on reliability of processors |
|
|
|
||
|
Up-to-date |
|
|
|
- ISO 5841-2:2000: Implants for surgery – Cardiac Pacemakers – Part 2: Reporting of clinical performance of populations of pulse generators or leads


CLOSE
BACK
PRINT
